*this is a joke. I thought the market determined fair value? And expected cash flows from assets that are worthless....
By Ian Katz
March 16 (Bloomberg) -- The Financial Accounting Standards Board, pressured by lawmakers to change the fair-value rule blamed for worsening the financial crisis, proposed permitting companies to use “significant judgment” in valuing assets.
Companies would be able to apply the revised rule to their first-quarter financial statements, FASB Chairman Robert Herz said today during a meeting at the U.S. accounting rulemaker’s Norwalk, Connecticut, headquarters. The board is set to vote on the proposal April 2, after a 15-day public comment period.
Fair-value, also known as mark-to-market accounting, requires companies to set values on most securities every quarter based on market prices. Wells Fargo & Co. and other companies argue the rule doesn’t make sense when trading has dried up because it forces banks to write down assets to fire- sale prices.
“Mark-to-market is fundamentally not about a quote on a screen,” Wells Fargo Chairman Richard Kovacevich said March 13 in a speech at Stanford University in California. “It should always be about expected cash flows.”
Most financial assets are not valued using fair-value. For example, General Electric Co. told investors this month that 2 percent of the assets of its GE Capital Corp. finance arm are valued based on market prices.
Well that wasn't so difficult, was it? Guess this means buyers for those securities will be lining up right quick. Now all they have to do is apply the same valuation methodology to housing prices and everything will be just like it was. It was just a bad dream.
ReplyDeletetoo funny. thanks for making me laugh
ReplyDelete